Vol. I (2020), No. 2

DIGITAL DUE DILIGENCE: A COMPLEMENTARY PERSPECTIVE TO THE TRADITIONAL APPROACH
Mladen Turuk  https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1204-3855
University of Zagreb, Croatia

Bojan Moric Milovanovic  https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7676-6983
Libertas International University, Croatia

Professional paper
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47954/ijcbe.1.2.4
JEL Classification: L21, L25, L26, G34, O33

Table of Contents

Abstract

Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) represent one of the most common ways for firms to achieve non-organic growth, and one of the main stages in the typical M&A transaction is due diligence of the target company. The aim of this paper is to provide a guideline for conducting due diligence process in a digital environment. After a brief introduction on the nature, purpose and elements of the due diligence, the paper elaborates various risks, and psychological and contextual hazards often occurred during due diligence process. Special attention has been paid to the elaboration of the role and importance of the digital due diligence as a new concept in today’s contemporary ‘digital’ economy. The outcome of this paper is to provide a comparison between ‘traditional’ and ‘digital’ due diligence, present a digital due diligence methodology, and main components for conducting the process of digital due diligence.

Key words: due diligence, digital, process, risks, IT

Full text

Download PDF here (pp. 54-66).

References

Adolph, G., Gillies, S., & Krings, J. (2006). Strategic due diligence: A foundation for M&A success. Strategy+ Business-enews, 1-8.


Angwin, D. (2001) ‘Mergers and acquisitions across European borders: National perspectives on preacquisition due diligence and the use of professional advisers’, Journal of World Business, 36(1), pp. 32-57


Benoliel, M. (2015) ‘Hazards to effective due diligence’, Eurasian Journal of Business and Management, 3(1), pp. 1-7


Bhagwan, V., Grobbelaar, S.S. & Bam, W.G. (2018) ‘A systematic review of the due diligence stage of mergers and acquisitions: towards a conceptual framework’, South African Journal of Industrial Engineering November, 29(3), special edition, pp. 217-234


BLOOM (online), Available at: https://www.bloomamsterdam.com/expertise/digital-due-diligence/ [20.11.2020.]


Bruner, R. 2004. Applied mergers and acquisitions. New York: John Wiley & Sons.


De Cleyn, S. H. and Braet, J. (2007) ‘The Due Diligence Process – Guiding Principles for Early Stage Innovative Products and Venture Capital Investments’, The Journal of Private Equity, 10(3), pp. 43-51


Harvey, M.G. & Lusch, R.F. (1995) ‘Expanding the nature and scope of due diligence’, Puterbaugh Chair of American Free Enterprise Helen Robson Walton Chair of Marketing Strategy, 9026(94), pp. 5–21


Mullins, T., Thornton, B. & Adams, M. (2007) ‘The role of due diligence in the business valuation process’, Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER), 5(5)


Palladium (online), Available at: https://palladiumdigital.co.uk/insights/why-digital-should-be-part-of-the-due-diligence-toolkit [20.11.2020.]


Recardo, R. J., & Toterhi, T. (2014). The secrets of operational and organizational due diligence. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 33(2), 14-30.


Rhodes, I., Nelson, C., & Berman, G. (2003). The key to successful collaborations: Rigorous and independent due diligence. Journal of commercial biotechnology, 9(4), 297-304.


Sambol, S. (2019) Digital due diligence: business examination 4.0 (online), Available at: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/digital-due-diligence-business-examination-40-dr-stefan-sambol [25.11.2020.]


Tsao, C. T. (2009). Applying a fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making approach to the M&A due diligence. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 1559-1568

 

Tables and Figures